Home / Industry Updates / Knowledge base
This is a library, not a feed. Things published here are meant to be correct in two years, which is a different job from being current this month. If you want what changed recently, that is the Monitor.
Upcoming and past aesthetic medicine and dermatology conferences in India, with dates, venues, organisers and links to each official site.
I2CAN's magazine for the aesthetic medicine and cosmetology profession in India. Free, open to the whole field, no login and no alumni gate. Technical pieces carry a named faculty byline; industry commentary carries the founder's.
Archive opens with the first issue.
Papers authored by I2CAN faculty, each listed with its journal, year and a link to the publisher. Where a paper sits behind a paywall we say so rather than linking to a copy we are not entitled to host.
List being compiled from the faculty record.
How a procedure actually works, what the evidence says, and where it stops. Written for practitioners rather than for search engines, which is why each one answers a question rather than covering a topic.
Seeded from the Monitor's Technical Note, which graduates here after three months.
Recordings of technical sessions and demonstrations. Alumni keep the live room; recordings open to the field afterwards.
Publishing schedule being confirmed.
Short structured sequences on a single subject. No qualification is awarded and none is implied.
In preparation.
These are not aspirations. They are the constraints that make everything else on these pages worth reading, and the reason a thin month produces a shorter issue rather than a padded one.
If a number cannot be attributed, it does not run. Not even hedged.
Clinical content carries an individual faculty byline and that named person signs off its accuracy. Industry commentary is written by the founder, who does not sign clinical content.
At least one null finding per issue. A publication that only reports success is an advertisement.
Favourably or otherwise. We will disagree with a trend. We will not disparage an institution.
Not course fees, not procedure fees, not device costs.
India has no registry for this field, and we will not dress someone else's numbers as ours.
If a category produced nothing worth reporting, it is left out rather than padded.
Thirty-two patients, three months, a single centre. Not as our hesitations about it.
